Friday, April 23, 2010

Will We Ever Be Nostalgic For The CD?

By Luke Lewis
Posted on 15/04/10 at 06:49:13 pm

“Our culture has become… utterly in love with its parent. It’s become a notion of boredom that is bought and sold, where nothing will happen except that people will become more and more terrified of tomorrow, because the new continues to look old, and the old will always look cute.”

That’s not a Justin Bieber lyric. It’s something Malcolm McLaren once said. He despised nostalgia. Which perhaps explains why the arch provocateur became such a fringe figure in recent years - because these days nostalgia is pretty much the only game in town.

Whether it’s Record Store Day, with its trainspotterish reverence for the days when hunched loners spent bleak Saturday afternoons pawing at dust-jacketed skiffle 12”s (as opposed to ordering online and then doing something less tedious with the rest of their day), or the much blogged-about cassette revival (actually involving about six people, most of whom write for Gorilla Vs Bear), musos are in agreement: music was better in them days – them days being, in almost every case, when they were teenagers, and music bewitched them for the first time.

continued...

Yet there’s one format that’s curiously resistant to nostalgia. In the MP3/streaming era, no-one seems to be mourning the death of the CD. Why is that? Has not enough time elapsed for a reappraisal to kick in (surely not: the noughties revival has already begun, after all). Or is there something fundamentally unlovable about this slice of polycarbonate plastic that dominated our listening habits for two decades?

There’s no shortage of theories. Some say the CD is undemocratic. Cassettes had a DIY, grass-roots quality that made them feel potentially seditious – hence the BPI campaign, “Home taping is killing music” – whereas compact discs were, from the start, nakedly a tool of the industry: the first CDs went onsale alongside the first CD players, in 1982. The technology behind both was developed in part by Sony.

From that point, the music industry’s jaw-dropping profitability for the rest of the 20th century was driven by middle-aged people upgrading their existing collections from vinyl to CD (providing almost pure profit for the labels).

The first bands to benefit from the CD age were already-successful arena-fillers like Dire Straits and U2. For that reason, the CD arrived with a kind of in-built fustiness – the leathery whiff of 50 quid man - even though the technology was glintingly new.

Consequently, we now associate CDs with the music biz in its blockbuster phase. Many of the enduring cultural phenomena of the ‘80s – Live Aid, Q magazine, the rise of suit-wearing yuppie pop stars like Phil Collins and Robert Palmer – were direct products of the CD age.

So: the CD never seemed like it was on the side of the fan. Home CD-ing never really took off. By the time the copying technology was widely available, we had MP3s instead. And besides, there was no magic to it. Who ever whiled away a happy weekend making and decorating a compilation CD-R?

And so on. The thing is, I’ve heard all these arguments, and I know what I ought to think in 2010 - but I just can’t bring myself to hate the compact disc. It’s time someone stuck up for this maligned format. CDs are basically brilliant, and here’s why.

1. They’re beautiful
Hold it up to the light: a gleaming arc of prismatic colour. Tilt it towards you and you can see your own idiot face staring back. Clever, no?

2. They don’t deteriorate
Record bores bang on about the ‘warmth’ of crackling vinyl. Cassette geeks hymn the palimpsestic quality of tape (ie you can hear the faint traces of what was there before). Meh. These are things music snobs say to make themselves feel superior to regular people. Personally I want to hear an album the way it was intended. CDs provide the purest, unmediated way to experience music.

3. They’re technological marvels
It’s an everyday miracle, how pouring liquefied plastic into a hydraulic press can produce something that blasts ‘The Holy Bible’ into your earholes. Just think. Before 1960 no human being had ever seen a laser beam. Thanks to CD players, by 1990 the technology was in practically in every home. Lasers in your living room! Come on, that’s impressive.

4. You can smear jam on them
This was a major early selling point, thanks to an episode of Tomorrow’s World in which a Bee Gees CD was shown to play after being covered in jam. It’s not clear why this was deemed a good thing – I’ve never handled a CD while making toast. Still, it’s good to know that it’s possible, should the need ever arise.

5. They are NOT ‘cheap’ or ‘plasticky’
People who say this are thinking of the packaging, particularly the jewel case, with its middle-bit that helpfully shatters into a thousand pieces if you look at it funny. But not all CDs come in jewel cases. Digipaks can be things of tactile gorgeousness. Indeed, (and this may be the most boring sentence I have ever written) I’m convinced that if the Digipak had become the industry standard, the CD might today still be in rude health.
So there you go. I started out railing against nostalgia, and ended up mired in gloopy affection for the past. But my basic point still stands: CDs rule. We used to think they were worth £16 each. And now we begrudge paying a penny for them. It’s a shame. But one day we will mourn their passing. Just you wait.

 

I think I’m one of the few people out there that still love CDs very much. I would love vinyl if I had a player to play them, they are more artistic, but they degrade after a while, and CDs seriously last forever. I love stripping the plastic off a jewel case, and opening the case, flipping through the booklets, and taking a brand new CD out of the case and popping it into the player and hearing that clear, undistorted music that blows my mind.

Friday, April 2, 2010

I have a Tumblr now!

I’m not sure what to do with this blog tho. I might keep it for music articles. And Tumblr for more photos & personal stuff. No idea yet. But can’t seem to post multiple photos in a post in Tumblr. But I can’t stand the layout of this blog. So much white! I’m def a black kind of person. Haha.

Nothing much at Tumblr yet besides lyrics and a picture of Jim Parsons (yippee)!

theenglishway.tumblr.com

The url isn’t meant to sound like I’m damn angmoh or whatever, its a Fightstar song that I love! Name of the Tumblr is Plug In Baby (currently my favourite Muse song)!

New CDs from Gramophone/CD-Rama sale

image

image 
image

image

image

image

image

image

image image

image

image

image

image

image image

Total = $130.

So worth it. 12 albums for $70 (Gramophone). 4 albums for $60 (CD-Rama). My only regret is two albums I got from CD-Rama for $10 each were going at $3.95 at Gramophone. Lol. But good deal anw. One of them came with a free tee (L size tho-I’m gonna use it as a nightgown). Haha.

Thursday, March 25, 2010

The greatest front men of all time

Neil McCormick

Is Liam Gallagher of Oasis really the greatest front man of all time?

Is Liam Gallagher of Oasis really the greatest front man of all time?

Readers polls are a bad advertisement for democracy.

The new issue of music Q magazine has a list of the best front men of all time, as voted for by their readers.

Here’s the top 20. Gird your loins
1) Liam Gallagher
2) Bono
3) Freddie Mercury
4) Damon Albarn
5) Chris Martin
6) Matt Bellamy
7) Jim Morrison
8)Bob Marley
9) Paul McCartney
10) John Lennon
11) Robbie Williams
12) Debbie Harry
13) Mick Jagger
14) Morrissey
15) John Lydon
16) James Brown
17) Bruce Springsteen
18) Robert Plant
19) Tom Meighan
20) Joe Strummer

So there you have it. It’s the triumph of Britpop. Not only is Liam Gallagher of Oasis the greatest frontman of all time (official) but we’ve got Blur and Coldplay in the top five. Of all time! And the current crop of Brit rockers Muse and Kasabian see off the claim of Roger Daltrey (with The Who) and Jimi Hendrix (The Experience).

Anyway, the criteria seem quite confused. Not sure if Debbie Harry ever considered herself a frontman. And if she counts, where’s Janis Joplin? Which throws up the whole slightly confusing issue of solo artists. If Robbie Williams and James Brown can be counted as frontmen, then where’s David Bowie and Prince? Or for that matter Elvis Presley and Michael Jackson? And if you start counting them, where do Lady GaGa and Beyonce fit in? And if we’re talking all time, what about Louis Armstrong, Al Jolson and Frank Sinatra. And that’s only going back a century

So, to restore some sanity to this, I have provided an alternative top ten of the greatest band front men and women in the history of rock, only including those solo artists who perform as part of a regular group. And we’re talking live performance here and really fronting the music, which, I think, discounts The Beatles, as obviously great as they were.

Think of this as a public service (and pray that Q’s readers are too young to vote in the general election).

1) Mick Jagger
2) Bruce Springsteen (with the E Street Band)
3) Jimi Hendrix (with The Experience)
4) Bono
5) Jim Morrison
6) Freddie Mercury
7) Liam Gallagher
8) Janis Joplin (with Big Brother & The Holding Company)
9) Robert Plant
10) Roger Daltrey

And actually I accept that Prince and James Brown may be better frontmen than the lot of them, but they are both really solo artists. And hovering at the edges of my list were Johnny Rotten (with The Sex Pistols), Bob Marley (with The Wailers), Iggy Pop (with The Stooges), Peter Gabriel (with Genesis), Joe Strummer (with The Clash), Morrissey (with The Smiths) and David Byrne (with Talking Heads). And I love Debbie Harry too, but I saw Blondie quite a bit back in the day, and believe me, she went a hell of a long way on sex appeal …

OK, I’m battening down the hatches now. You can tell me what you think. Just remember … this is NOT a democracy!

Monday, March 22, 2010

I’m constantly frustrated with my lack of iPod ever since I lost my iPhone last year. Been using Jon Ho’s Creative player ever since, but it kind of conked out a few days ago, right before the D1M3 performance, and I was using the player for the performance since I’m the sound op. Had to resort to using CDs instead.

Its not easy to listen to music without a good player with a large memory, since I somehow naturally get new music every day, and its necessary to have a player to listen to, to decide what I like and what’s not worth listening to again. Can’t always do so on the computer, its not like I bring it around 24/7.

Sometimes I feel bad listening to music that I downloaded (illegally), which is most of my music, since I can’t afford to buy CDs at the rate I consume music. The list of albums I wish to own is never-ending, and until now I don’t own many albums that I’d like to own, like albums from Franz Ferdinand, Oasis, Arctic Monkeys, Electrico…

I can’t consciously stop myself from downloading because that would mean I’ll get so frustrated that I’d buy albums, even though I can’t afford to, and that’s totally irresponsible of me. I remember having to depend on buying albums for music. It sucked big time. I would bring 20 CDs on an overseas trip and not listen to anything cos’ I was so sick of everything.

Plus, downloading’s the only way to obtain certain rare tracks. Well I just got Mika’s new song, Kick Ass (from the movie Kick Ass), and that’s pretty much unobtainable.

Most Cobra fans would also know that certain Cobra tracks are extremely rare and cannot be found on any published album (I Kissed A Boy, Hollaback Boy).

Some people would wonder, why tear yourself up over such a trivial thing? But its not trivial at all. Artists that have poured their souls and hearts out into making good music deserve to get paid. I agree with that. Too bad I can’t afford to get everything that I think is good. At least, not at the moment. I have to factor in merch (proudly representing the bands I love), overseas trips, and other daily things as well. And yeah I do splurge on random crap sometimes.

So, what to do? I guess I’m just justifying my actions, but I think its something that I need to do for myself.

Thursday, March 18, 2010

The Go! Team

 

 

 

 

 

I saw The Go! Team last night at Esplanade Theatre Studio (Heineken Music Club)! Yep I went alone, cos’ there’s no one I know that knows this band, and most Singaporeans are boring in that they would never pay a reasonable amount of money just to check out a band that’s interesting. The only song I sorta know is Huddle Formation, but I don’t even know the lyrics. But I went to see how they play live, and how they are on a stage. And they are REALLY good. Really unpredictable, unexpected. Two drummers at all times, a banjo, recorder (yes those that we play in primary school), a harmonica… Can’t classify any of them as vocalists/drummers/guitarists cos’ they’re all vocalists, drummers and guitarists, and sometimes bassists and keyboardists. Talk about a versatile band. Well if you want me to put a label to their music, I would describe them as indie hip-hop. Which already seems like an oxymoron cos’ indie and hip-hop don’t go together. Indie fans usually despise hip-hop/R&B (me included). But they’re good. The rapping goes together. And I really wouldn’t call it rapping, its more like singing/speaking. And the frontwoman is FREAKIN’ AWESOME. Her stage energy is amazing and infectious. And they work up the crowd pretty good too!

They had an autograph session after that, and they were really nice. I managed to get a copy of their first album there (second album sold out) so I got them to “sign” it. I put “” because most of them didn’t exactly sign it. They drew pictures. And some lucky people got the setlist from that night, cos’ some roadie randomly gave it out. All in all it was a pretty good gig, crowd was pretty good, and it was fun. Priced at $43, a perfectly reasonable price considering there’s one free drink.

Hope I can spread the word around about this really good band.